White Papers

Thinking Outside of the Box: Optimizing System Design with Embedded Expertise

May 12, 2014 | BY: Jacob Sealander

Download PDF

Today, defense and aerospace system integrators are under increasing schedule and budget pressure. While funding for new programs is harder to come by, the technical requirements for deployed systems continues to increase as platforms become more digitally connected and sensor rich. One frequently overlooked strategy that can significantly aid a system integrator's efforts to develop an optimal system solution, especially when confronted with space, weight and power (SWaP) constraints, is to engage COTS hardware vendors early in their design process. As experts in the myriad available options for processing performance, form factors, thermal management techniques and packaging, COTS vendors can share their broad knowledge and deep familiarity with alternative approaches that can transform an acceptable design approach into an optimal solution.

COTS hardware suppliers solve embedded integration problems every day. By tapping into that expertise, system integrators are freed to better focus on the application space, which is typically their domain of expertise. During the design process it's natural for system integrators to view their system development challenges at the Line Replaceable Unit (LRU) level, while COTS hardware suppliers can provide a potentially greater and beneficial understanding of the Line Replaceable Module (LRM), power supply, and cooling aspects of the components that will be used to comprise the LRU. Often, there is a perceived design constraint, such as form factor, weight or size, that will motivate the early direction of an LRU design. COTS vendors can bring a fresh set of eyes to the problem, applying their own systems engineering experience to address the prime constraints with an innovative alternative approach.

When a COTS hardware supplier is engaged in a dialogue with the customer and provided the opportunity to fully understand the platform and architecture requirements of a new subsystem design, they are able to apply their system engineering perspective and often help the customer identify a better solution than what was originally presented, enabling the solution to be re-architected while reducing cost and schedule time.

This white paper discusses three separate design challenges posed by customers in the embedded subsystem design process. Learn more how Curtiss-Wright helped resolved the challenges.

Author’s Biography

Jacob Sealander

Chief Architect Embedded Systems

Jacob Sealander is the Chief Architect, Integrated Systems at Curtiss-Wright. As the Chief Architect, his primary responsibility is new business capture for the Integrated Systems Group. In this role he is the primary point of contact to potential new customers, providing not only architecture support but commercial guidance, as well as the technical authority on proposal content including all technical content as well as pricing strategies, including basis of estimates. Jacob Sealander began his employment with Curtiss-Wright in 1996 as a mechanical designer and has progressed within the company for the past 18 years. Jacob has held a management position within Curtiss-Wright Defense Solutions for the past 9 years and took on the position of Chief Architect in 2006. Jacob holds a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from California State University of Northridge.

Share This Article

  • Share on Linkedin
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on Google+
Connect With Curtiss-Wright Connect With Curtiss-Wright Connect With Curtiss-Wright


Contact our sales team today to learn more about our products and services.





Our support team can help answer your questions - contact us today.